Is VirtualDub and DeShaker still the preferred way of stabilizing motion? » Technical Support » Auto Forum
Auto Forum

Auto Forum



ПоискПоиск   Users   Registration   Entrance
Today: 25.06.2025 - 04:19:54
Pages:  1  2  

Is VirtualDub and DeShaker still the preferred way of stabilizing motion?

Advertising

.
MessageAuthor

A long time ago, when I asked about this, DeShaker was the most recommended option. I tried some suggested DePan settings but they never really satisfied me. Has anything been created on the Avisynth side that produces at least as good results as the VDub route?

-------------------------------------

AaronM3

register users




Statistics:
Messages: 34
Registration: 09.22.2002
05.12.24 - 03:20:41
Message # 1
RE: Is VirtualDub and DeShaker still the preferred way of stabilizing motion?

I still recommend Deshaker + VDub. Depanstabilize isn't as flexible as deshaker in difficult situations. For best image quality I suggest to prepare an interlaced video like this: 1) Code:

-------------------------------------
325iSE Portsmouth. UK. "I have not lost my mind.....it's backed up on disk somewhere" If Utopia is just a state of mind, keep on dreaming. Born Lazy and probably tooo lazy to die!!!

Des

register users




Statistics:
Messages: 494
Registration: 06.27.2001
05.12.24 - 03:30:21
Message # 2
RE: Is VirtualDub and DeShaker still the preferred way of stabilizing motion?

How about those older videos where there is a small (usually vertical) jitter of a couple of pixels here and there, is there anything that could be used to stabilize them?

-------------------------------------

nikkis34

register users




Statistics:
Messages: 103
Registration: 01.12.2003
05.12.24 - 03:41:01
Message # 3
RE: Is VirtualDub and DeShaker still the preferred way of stabilizing motion?

this issue can be well treated with depanstabilize and very low limits for vertical compensation and near to zero limit for horizontal compensation. I used depanstabilize to de-jitter some old film footage before. It works quite well for this purpose. But for handheld camera deshaking I don't recommend depanstabilize.

-------------------------------------

///Molloy

register users




Statistics:
Messages: 3,444
Registration: 06.26.2003
05.12.24 - 03:46:24
Message # 4
RE: Is VirtualDub and DeShaker still the preferred way of stabilizing motion?

I've never been able to dial in the settings for DePanStabilize to be of any use. Doesn't fix quick jitter, and tracks slower pans too well. Notice that my script doesn't use DePanStabilize though! You'll only know how well it works if you try it. -G

-------------------------------------
scott Freedman 94 325is tons of miles in Grun frosch (froggy green) :krakrani:

scott_freedman

register users




Statistics:
Messages: 503
Registration: 04.29.2003
05.12.24 - 03:57:16
Message # 5
RE: Is VirtualDub and DeShaker still the preferred way of stabilizing motion?

Doesn't really matter 

-------------------------------------
Projects / Pictures => http://mybuildgarage.com/author/carreraboy/

carreraboy911

register users




Statistics:
Messages: 4,226
Registration: 01.30.2002
05.12.24 - 04:04:15
Message # 6
RE: Is VirtualDub and DeShaker still the preferred way of stabilizing motion?

Perfect. 

-------------------------------------
E36 Component Weight Log

TIATO

register users




Statistics:
Messages: 96
Registration: 06.04.2002
05.12.24 - 04:12:22
Message # 7
RE: Is VirtualDub and DeShaker still the preferred way of stabilizing motion?

The clip is mostly static, but there are two high speed pans in it. I'll try your method and report back, thanks for the suggestion, g-force :). [edit]Doesn't work, it creates an ugly sort of artifacting in a single frame, looks sort-of like a grid. I'll give DeShaker a shot now, but will try your suggestion (deshaking a deblocked version, then filtering that, right?).

-------------------------------------

Hugo

register users




Statistics:
Messages: 21,084
Registration: 01.04.2002
05.12.24 - 04:16:27
Message # 8
RE: Is VirtualDub and DeShaker still the preferred way of stabilizing motion?

Would you say this is more efficient then Depan or Deshaker? or this? how about Autodesks Stabilizer?

-------------------------------------
PSOT

RichP

register users




Statistics:
Messages: 42
Registration: 07.01.2001
05.12.24 - 04:23:17
Message # 9
RE: Is VirtualDub and DeShaker still the preferred way of stabilizing motion?

German magazine c't compared 4 video stabilizers in it's issue 05/2008. They tested the following products: - Mercalli Expert - Premiere Elements 4 - Studio Version 11 - Gunnar Thalins Deshaker v2.2 Here's the table with results: The table contains ratings for the following features: - stabilizing camera turns - stabilizing continuous shaking/jitter - stabilizing closeup scenes - stabilizing single shakes - stabilizing with default settings

-------------------------------------
Don Cepek Jr.

1highbeam

register users




Statistics:
Messages: 737
Registration: 09.12.2002
05.12.24 - 04:29:49
Message # 10
RE: Is VirtualDub and DeShaker still the preferred way of stabilizing motion?
Colourlike for Audio? : Previous topicNext topic: MJPEG -> XVID or MPEG4
Pages:  1  2  

The administrator has prohibited guests from replying to messages! To register, follow the link: register


Participants