Anyone using Jam 6.0.2 ?? Work OK?? >> FORUM
Auto Forum

Auto Forum



SearchSearch   Users   Registration   Entrance
Today: 05.12.2025 - 08:32:50
Pages:  1  2  

Anyone using Jam 6.0.2 ?? Work OK??

MessageAuthor

Jam 6 looks pretty much like Jam 5 to me... Can you have multiple track IDs in one file now?




hotdog19d

register users




Statistics:
Messages: 139
Registration: 12.16.2002
09.11.21 - 17:17:06
Message # 11
RE: Anyone using Jam 6.0.2 ?? Work OK??

Re: Anyone using Jam 6.0.2 ?? Work OK?? 




NATIALE

register users




Statistics:
Messages: 535
Registration: 10.25.2002
09.11.21 - 17:28:39
Message # 12
RE: Anyone using Jam 6.0.2 ?? Work OK??

infa... waveburner allows you to manipulate id's as you like...... essential for compiling finished cd for pressing also.... isrc codes is not supported in toast..... again essential..... jam has the ability to make crossfades and fades but (by far) not at easily as WB toast is fine for burning a track to the a&r guy ..... but that's it (as far as audio is concerned) "Apple is really dragging ass for a OSX version on this one." apple has nothing to do with porting WB to os x..... this is entirely up to emagic..... someone said that they will integrate it as a part of logic..... if that's true i'd rather buy a pc for burning ..... as much as i hate pc's i hate logic even more....


-------------------------------------
Dignity, Charm, and Contentment... The joys of happy pipe smoking

captainkarl

register users




Statistics:
Messages: 327
Registration: 08.28.2003
09.11.21 - 17:33:29
Message # 13
RE: Anyone using Jam 6.0.2 ?? Work OK??

Re: Anyone using Jam 6.0.2 ?? Work OK?? 




Aren G

register users




Statistics:
Messages: 2,533
Registration: 07.04.2002
09.11.21 - 17:43:15
Message # 14
RE: Anyone using Jam 6.0.2 ?? Work OK??

zr-rock took the words right out of mouh. WaveBurner Pro is for mastering. If you're just compiling songs, Jam is OK. But, if you are adding ID's and easy custom fades, WaveBurner Pro is the answer.


-------------------------------------
"...time to burn some dust...eat my rubber."

Lugosi

register users




Statistics:
Messages: 255
Registration: 04.25.2003
09.11.21 - 17:54:25
Message # 15
RE: Anyone using Jam 6.0.2 ?? Work OK??

Re: Anyone using Jam 6.0.2 ?? Work OK?? 


-------------------------------------
Oh Me oh My its Time to Roll -

databass

register users




Statistics:
Messages: 470
Registration: 10.23.2003
09.11.21 - 17:58:52
Message # 16
RE: Anyone using Jam 6.0.2 ?? Work OK??

Wow,,, it sounds cool,,, exactly what I've been lookin' for once I come across the (very few) limitations of Jam... But I do not use 9 anymore, and as stated earlier by MarvinBass, is it true that it only is for OS 9 right now ?? If so ,, that SUCKS........... I guess I'll have to wait.....


-------------------------------------
86 Mustang SVO - 2.3L Turbo 01 Suzuki SV650

wolf2600

register users




Statistics:
Messages: 30
Registration: 02.19.2002
09.11.21 - 18:02:58
Message # 17
RE: Anyone using Jam 6.0.2 ?? Work OK??

Re: Anyone using Jam 6.0.2 ?? Work OK?? 


-------------------------------------
Vagina- The box a pen!s comes in.

foRRREVerz

register users




Statistics:
Messages: 780
Registration: 01.29.2002
09.11.21 - 18:09:23
Message # 18
RE: Anyone using Jam 6.0.2 ?? Work OK??
parsing error since R4 : Previous topicNext topic: VirtualDub Crashes
Pages:  1  2  

Message
Name
Message

Click on the dot next to the name to address the participant

           
   
The administrator has prohibited guests from replying to messages! To register, follow the link: register


Participants